Choice Hotels International attracted significant attention from regulators, investors and the hotel industry when its effort to acquire rival Wyndham Hotels & Resorts evolved from a proposed corporate combination into an aggressive takeover campaign. What began as an attempt to combine two of the largest hotel franchising businesses ultimately ended with Choice Hotels abandoning the transaction in March 2024 amid resistance from Wyndham and scrutiny from federal competition regulators.
The proposed acquisition was particularly significant because both companies control extensive portfolios of recognizable hotel brands. Choice Hotels operates brands including Comfort, Quality Inn, Econo Lodge, Cambria and Ascend Hotel Collection, while Wyndham Hotels & Resorts operates brands including Days Inn, Super 8, Ramada, La Quinta, Microtel and Travelodge.
Combining the companies therefore had implications extending well beyond their corporate headquarters. Thousands of independently owned franchised hotels operate under brands belonging to the two companies, while millions of travelers encounter their properties throughout the United States.
Those circumstances helped turn the proposed Choice Hotels acquisition of Wyndham into an antitrust issue eventually scrutinized by the Federal Trade Commission.
Choice Hotels Pursues Wyndham
Choice Hotels had been attempting to negotiate an acquisition of Wyndham before the dispute became public. Wyndham’s leadership rejected Choice’s proposals, questioning both the economics of the transaction and the likelihood that regulators would approve a combination of the companies.
Choice Hotels nevertheless continued pursuing the deal.
In October 2023, Choice publicly announced an acquisition proposal after private discussions between the companies failed to produce an agreement. The proposed transaction valued Wyndham at approximately $7.8 billion at the time of the announcement.
Choice argued that combining the businesses could create a stronger hotel franchising company with a broad selection of brands spanning different segments of the lodging market.
Wyndham saw things differently.
Its board rejected the unsolicited proposal, raising concerns about valuation, execution risk and regulatory uncertainty. Wyndham also argued that combining two major hotel franchisors would face a lengthy regulatory review.
The disagreement soon developed into something considerably more contentious than an ordinary acquisition negotiation.
The Attempt Becomes a Hostile Takeover
After Wyndham repeatedly rejected its proposals, Choice Hotels decided to take its case directly to Wyndham shareholders.
In December 2023, Choice launched an exchange offer to acquire Wyndham’s outstanding shares. This effectively transformed the acquisition effort into a hostile takeover attempt because Choice was attempting to complete the transaction without the support of Wyndham’s existing board.
Choice Hotels also pursued changes to Wyndham’s board of directors.
The company nominated a slate of candidates for election to Wyndham’s board, potentially giving shareholders the opportunity to replace existing directors with individuals who could take a different position regarding the Choice Hotels proposal.
These tactics significantly increased the stakes.
The dispute was no longer simply about whether Wyndham executives wanted to sell the company. Choice was attempting to persuade Wyndham shareholders that the acquisition should move forward despite the opposition of Wyndham’s leadership.
At the same time, another important participant was examining the proposed combination: the Federal Trade Commission.
FTC Scrutiny Creates Another Obstacle
The FTC is responsible for enforcing federal competition laws and reviewing transactions that could substantially reduce competition.
A combination involving Choice Hotels and Wyndham naturally attracted regulatory attention because both companies operate enormous hotel franchise systems.
The regulatory questions were not limited to competition for travelers. Hotel franchisors also compete against one another for franchisees. Independent hotel owners deciding which brand to operate under may compare franchise fees, reservation systems, marketing support, contractual requirements and other conditions offered by competing hotel companies.
A merger eliminating one major franchising company could potentially affect competition on both sides of that relationship.
The FTC later confirmed that it had been closely examining Choice Hotels’ actions.
According to the agency, regulators were scrutinizing both Choice’s tender offer and its attempt to replace members of Wyndham’s board.
Choice Hotels Walks Away
By March 2024, the takeover effort was over.
Choice Hotels announced that it was withdrawing its exchange offer and abandoning its effort to acquire Wyndham. The company also withdrew its nominations of candidates for Wyndham’s board.
Choice explained that after evaluating the circumstances, including Wyndham’s continued unwillingness to participate in discussions, it determined that continuing the takeover effort was not in the best interests of Choice shareholders.
The decision brought an end to months of increasingly aggressive attempts to complete the transaction.
But the FTC’s reaction demonstrated just how seriously federal regulators had been examining the proposed combination.
FTC Calls Abandonment a “Win for Consumers”
After Choice Hotels terminated the takeover attempt, the Federal Trade Commission issued an unusually direct public response.
FTC Bureau of Competition Director Henry Liu said the agency was pleased that Choice had abandoned its attempt to take control of Wyndham.
The agency said it had been closely scrutinizing both the tender offer and Choice’s effort to replace Wyndham directors. According to Liu, those actions presented “serious competition questions.”
The FTC characterized the abandonment of the takeover as a victory for consumers.
The agency also emphasized that competition between hotel franchisors matters not only for travelers seeking affordable lodging but also for hotel franchisees choosing among competing brands.
The FTC said it intended to continue monitoring competition within the hotel industry and would enforce antitrust laws when necessary.
Importantly, Choice’s decision to terminate the transaction meant the FTC did not ultimately have to prove in court that the proposed acquisition violated antitrust law. The FTC’s concerns should therefore be distinguished from a judicial determination that the transaction was illegal.
There was no such final ruling because the proposed combination never occurred.
Why the Choice Hotels-Wyndham Deal Was Controversial
The controversy surrounding the proposed takeover illustrates the enormous scale that hotel franchising companies have achieved.
To travelers driving along an interstate, a Quality Inn and a Days Inn may simply look like competing hotels. Behind those properties, however, are enormous franchise organizations providing branding, reservation technology, loyalty programs, marketing and other services to thousands of independently operated properties.
Choice Hotels and Wyndham are particularly prominent within the economy and midscale portions of the hotel market.
Combining the companies could therefore have altered the competitive landscape for hotel owners deciding which franchise system to join.
Choice Hotels presented the proposed combination as an opportunity to create additional value and build a stronger hospitality company. Wyndham’s leadership repeatedly argued that Choice underestimated the regulatory difficulties and risks associated with completing such a transaction.
Ultimately, Wyndham’s prediction that regulatory scrutiny would become a significant issue proved consequential, although regulation was not the only reason the transaction failed.
Choice Hotels’ Aggressive Strategy Falls Short
The Wyndham episode also demonstrated how far Choice Hotels was prepared to go in pursuing a major competitor.
After private negotiations failed, Choice publicly announced its proposal. When Wyndham rejected the offer, Choice took the proposal directly to shareholders. When Wyndham’s board remained opposed, Choice nominated alternative directors.
Each move increased pressure on Wyndham.
But the strategy also increased scrutiny surrounding the proposed acquisition.
By early 2024, Choice Hotels faced an unwilling acquisition target, an expensive corporate battle and an FTC actively examining the competitive consequences of the proposed transaction.
Choice ultimately concluded that continuing the effort no longer made sense.
The two companies remained independent competitors.
A Significant Chapter in Choice Hotels’ Corporate History
The failed Wyndham acquisition stands as one of the most notable corporate controversies involving Choice Hotels in recent years.
Unlike lawsuits involving individual Choice-branded properties, this dispute concerned decisions made at the highest levels of the corporation and a transaction that potentially could have reshaped a significant portion of the American hotel franchise industry.
Choice Hotels was legally entitled to pursue an acquisition and to make its case directly to Wyndham shareholders. Wyndham was equally entitled to oppose the proposal. The controversy arose from the aggressive nature of the takeover campaign and the competition concerns surrounding the combination of two major hotel franchisors.
The FTC’s involvement gives the episode additional significance.
When Choice finally abandoned the takeover in March 2024, federal regulators publicly welcomed the decision and described the termination as beneficial to consumers and competition.
For Choice Hotels, the episode ended without the transformative acquisition it had spent months pursuing. For Wyndham, it meant remaining an independent company. And for federal regulators, the abandoned transaction avoided what potentially could have developed into a major antitrust confrontation over consolidation within the hotel franchise industry.
The failed takeover remains an important example of the regulatory challenges Choice Hotels can encounter when attempting to dramatically expand its already substantial position within the hospitality market.
Choice Hotels Leadership and Response
At the time of the Wyndham takeover attempt, Choice Hotels was led by President and CEO Patrick Pacious, with Stewart Bainum Jr. serving as chairman of the company’s board. Choice Hotels did publicly defend the proposed acquisition, with Pacious arguing that the combination would be pro-competitive and disputing Wyndham’s warnings about antitrust risk. When Choice ultimately abandoned the takeover in March 2024, the company said Wyndham’s unwillingness to engage constructively, along with insufficient shareholder participation in the exchange offer, left no viable path to completing the transaction. Choice continued to maintain that regulatory approval could have been achieved. The Federal Trade Commission offered a sharply different assessment, saying Choice’s tender offer and effort to replace Wyndham’s board had raised “serious competition questions” and describing the abandonment of the takeover as a win for consumers. Choice Hotels is now led by President and CEO Dominic Dragisich, who was permanently appointed to the position in August 2026 following Pacious’s departure as CEO earlier that year. Dominic Dragisich isn’t much of a speaker and doesn’t address many issues around Choice Hotels. The same is true, in my opinion, of Choice Hotels’ Kishan Patel and Jarnail Singh, who is the franchisee of Quality Inn in Fife, Washington. They just hope by being quite things will go away on their own. This website is permanent and growing in traffic quickly.
Just another example of why Choice Hotels is a Horrible Choice.
Sources for this article: